Self Study About Belbin Model

Here I am trying to explain how me made the groups basically following the Babel Model. When you left [from] the room everybody started to turn around the tables looking for the profiles of the other persons.
I found THIS not particularly useful so I suggested WRITING down a list of all the profiles.After that i started to ask profile by profile who had chosen thESE and the order of preference. At the end of this operation we got a list of every profile with its suitable PEOPLE.

THEN we started to divide people from the category that was having less suitable PEOPLE: the coordinator.We were only three persons suitable for that: me, DOHA and mehdi; one per group. FROM THIS, WE obtained a little base to build the groups.
From that point we started to look for every person who was wishing most to suit a profile by the grade of preference.

Doing THIS, we had 3 groups made dividing ,for first, womEN and thEN people from different nationalitIES. It wasn't possible only in the group with 4 people where the are two Iranian people.
I kept on filling the scheme of the groups by the grade of preference people said about the profiles, but THEN Mehdi preferred to do that choosing from the beginning the profiles in every group.
Personally I found THIS NOT PARTICULARLY USEFUL because before, not knowing about the preferences of other person, everyONE had been honest with THEMSELVES, about THEIR OWN skills: deciding all together, people started to challEnge particular profiles and , if before the list was quite ended, after people didn't find a good agreement. To demonstrate this I kept the individual preferences of everyone and we can see that the groups were mostly done but starting to challenge about the profiles, not thinking about the cHararateristic of everyone, people didn't find an agreement.

List of the profiles with siutable persons and order of preferencePlant ; Tuk 1 Johnson 3 Solemaz 2 Sanaz 3 Sebastian 1 Doha 2Resource Investigator; Marco 1 Johnson 4Coordinator; Mehdi 1 Marco 3 Doha 3Shaper; Tuk 2 Johnson 2 Doha 1 Arifi 2Monitor evaluator; Andreas2 Marco 2 Doha 2 Mehdi 2Team worker; Johnson 1 Tuk 3 Solemaz 1 Sanaz 2 Marco 4Implementer; Arifi 3 Achilis 2 Sebastian3Complementer finisher specialist Tuk 4 Mehdi 3 Andreas 4 Achilis 1 Arifi 4Partial result using the grade of preference expressed beforePLANTRESOURCE INVESTIGATORCOORDINATORSHAPERMONITOR EVALUATORTEAM WORKERIMPLEMENTERCOMPLEMENTER FINISHERSPECIALISTGROUP 1PLANT TukRESOURCE INVESTIGATOR --COORDINATOR MehdiSHAPER TukMONITOR EVALUATOR MehdiTEAM WORKER SanazIMPLEMENTER AchillisCOMPLEMENTER FINISHER sanazSPECIALIST Achillisgroup 2PLANT sebastianRESOURCE INVESTIGATOR marcoCOORDINATOR marcoSHAPERMONITOR EVALUATOR marcoTEAM WORKER solemazIMPLEMENTER sebastianCOMPLEMENTER FINISHERSPECIALIST we hav had to decide other things together better between sebastian and solemazgroup 3PLANT Arifi RESOURCE INVESTIGATORjohnsonCOORDINATOR DohaSHAPER johnsonMONITOR EVALUATOR DohaTEAM WORKER JohnsonIMPLEMENTER ArifiCOMPLEMENTER FINISHER --SPECIALIST Arifijust the complementar finisher to decideNOW THE RESULT CHOOSING THE PROFILES BETWEEN GROUPS ONCE THE GROUPS WERE CREATEDGROUP 1PLANT ---RESOURCE INVESTIGATOR---COORDINATOR mehdiSHAPER takMONITOR EVALUATOR mehdiTEAM WORKER takIMPLEMENTER AchilliCOMPLEMENTER FINISHER takSPECIALIST Mehdi /achilli/ takgroup 2PLANT SebRESOURCE INVESTIGATOR sanazCOORDINATOR marcoSHAPER marcoMONITOR EVALUATOR marcoTEAM WORKER sanazIMPLEMENTER sebCOMPLEMENTER FINISHER seb SPECIALIST sanazbasically we followed the preview methodgroup 3PLANT Mohamed RESOURCE INVESTIGATOR Doha COORDINATOR DohaSHAPER SahmazMONITOR EVALUATOR allTEAM WORKER JohnsonIMPLEMENTER allCOMPLEMENTER FINISHER allSPECIALIST MohamedOk i took it too seriously... I need some facebooking now^^